When should you concede to a counterargument. Chapter 9 2019-01-06
When should you concede to a counterargument Rating:
7,4/10
664
reviews
Counterargument
The parallel statement to that is humans may have increased the rate of global warming. Scientific ignorance: Due to the heat dissipation of the earth, it is harder to raise a thing one degree when it is hotter, than when it is colder. That includes researching to find the thought leaders on the opposing side of your topic, presenting their arguments in an honest light, and then moving into respectful refutation. Addressing counterarguments also gives you an opportunity to clarify and strengthen your argument, helping to show how your argument is stronger than other arguments. Gonzales is not a teacher.
This often gets the creative juices flowing. In Steven Krause offers a thorough explanation of what counterargument is and how to respond to it. It allows you to anticipate doubts and pre-empt objections that a skeptical reader might have; it presents you as the kind of person who weighs alternatives before arguing for one, who confronts difficulties instead of sweeping them under the rug, who is more interested in discovering the truth than winning a point. Having such an inner conversation during the drafting stage, however, can help you settle on a case worth making. Counter arguments are frequently used in academic essays.
The more your readers believe that you are being fair to your opponents, the more likely they are to be open to your refutation. Metaphor - Compare the counter-argument to something else that demonstrates its weakness. See for help linking supporting evidence to your. It allows you to anticipate doubts and pre-empt objections that a skeptical reader might have; it presents you as the kind of person who weighs alternatives before arguing for one, who confronts difficulties instead of sweeping them under the rug, who is more interested in discovering the truth than winning a point. Evidence Do not stop with having a point. Arguments in academic writing are usually complex and take time to develop. His 1929 demonstration was the first fully electronic system ever seen.
You have to come out and state both your claim and your evidence clearly. It should be strong and reasonable, but not too strong. Finding Credible Sources for Counterarguments You can boost your credibility by acknowledging specific sources who disagree with your position. In terms of a football match, goal conceded means the number let in by a team. If considering a counterargument changes your position, you will need to go back and revise your original argument accordingly.
Suddenly your working thesis seems inexact or more vague than you had originally thought. Further, when dealing with something organic such as the earth, small percentages can make a big difference. A critical thinker assesses the evidence supporting both sides of a question, but must ultimately decide which way the balance of evidence tilts. A strong thesis not only grabs the interest of your reader, who now wants to see you support your unique interpretation, it also provides a focus for your argument, one to which every part of your paper refers in the development of your position. First, I would encourage you to examine those ideas to see if you can place them in some sort of hierarchical order.
Which of the following choices is a sound argument? Some Examples of Constructing Thesis Statements I. Think of warrants as the glue that holds an argument together and ensures all pieces work together coherently. The resources listed above should help you decide when and what to concede, refute, and rebut. Logical deduction or chain - Predict how the counter-argument might fail if accepted. Responding to counterarguments You do not need to attempt to do all of these things as a way to respond; instead, choose the response strategy that makes the most sense to you, for the counterargument that you have.
Address one or two counterarguments in a rebuttal. Presenting a counter argument gives you an opportunity to respond to criticism in your own essay. In this case, you might write the following: The New Deal both defended capitalist economic principles and offered government assistance to needy Americans, making it conservative and liberal at the same time. Then you state the case against yourself as briefly but as clearly and forcefully as you can, pointing to evidence where possible. Explain this different conclusion and then respond to it.
To gain some clarity, try the following exercise. When attempting to determine whether your thesis statement is really an argument, ask yourself whether someone could contest what you are claiming. The system was based on John Logie Baird's developments first demonstrated in 1925. Ask: What parts of this issue will concern my opposing audience the most? Therefore, man is inherently an herbivore, not a carnivore. It was revived when the theory of plate tectonics provided this mechanism. What are the principal issues involved in this argument? An argument should take a stance about a particular point of view, thesis, or claim.
However, it was agreed that the 20th century was probably the hottest on record in the past thousand years. Simply highlighting a text is only good for memorizing that text—it does not encourage critical reading. Be sure that each paragraph is connected to your argument. What if you have two or three major ideas that you want your reader to remember? Finally, both sides of the political spectrum were being accused of starting 'Fake News' stories. Formulating a thesis is not the first thing you do after reading an essay assignment. But at some point in the process of composing an essay, you need to switch off the questioning in your head and make a case.
Ninety-nine percent of the time you will need to make some sort of claim and use evidence to support it, and your ability to do this well will separate your papers from those of students who merely provide accumulations of fact and detail. The passive voice often fails to identify who or what is performing the actions you are describing. When you can imagine an intelligent disagreement, you have an arguable idea. When you counter-argue, you consider a possible argument against your thesis or some aspect of your reasoning. You cannot convince a confused person, so keep things tidy and ordered. By considering what someone who disagrees with your position might have to say about your argument, you show that your have thought things through, and you dispose of some of the reasons your audience might have for not accepting your argument. Reassess and revise your thesis.
