The difference between teleological and deontological is that. The Difference Between Teleological and Deontological Ethical Systems Essay 2019-01-05

Ethics 1 Flashcards

Another argument would be, how long down the road most you look to decide if a decision is for the greater good. Thus, this is a non-consequential theory as the decision of whether an act is good or bad does not depend on its consequence. For example, the Divine Command Theory states that an action is right if God has declared it to be right. What Does Teleological Ethics Mean? What matters is what might happen as a consequence of those actions in any given context. For example, most people believe that lying is wrong, but if telling a lie would do no harm and help to make a person happy or save someone, this action would be right in teleological ethics. Weaknesses: Who can determine what God told someone, atheist's in this belief have no morals, can God change his mind? Teleological ethics are also often referred to as consequentialism.

Explain the difference between a Deontological and Teleological approach to Ethics free essay sample

If you understand that a kitten grows up to be a cat - so long as it's not killed along the way - or that an acorn grows to be an oak tree - again, provided it's not killed along the way - then you understand something about teleology. Moreover a system which removes emotion and experience from moral decisions makes every decision made extremely fair and unbiased. The fight is broken up and initially you are suspended. Also, I think you should take note that both theories only take concern with certain questions of morality, which makes you wonder if maybe they are not asking all the right questions. In order to make correct moral choices, you have to have some understanding of what will result from your choices. A deontological moral system may be seen in many religions, where you follow the rules and duties that are said to have been established by God or the church. A deontological ethical system is one that is concerned solely with the inherent nature of the act being judged.

Difference between teleological and deontological ethics

For instance, a teleological view of animals proposes that current animals are, in some sense, an intended end of evolution or creation. You'll then need to work out sources and how the examples match up to each ethical theory. I will look at two teleological ethical theories, the first being Thomas Hobbes? Very interesting way of putting things. In the study of deontological ethics, it is the right or wrong of the action that defines it. I Accept Reject Teleology and deontology are two of the three major approaches to the study of ethics. If the action is considered to be in a good intent, even with the possibilities of having negative consequences, then it is still defined as being good.

Explain the difference between a Deontological and Teleological approach to Ethics free essay sample

Also both theories state that you cannot use people or groups for your own good. So in essence teleological ethics are decided by the ends not the actions that bring you to them. However Teleological ethical theories look at the consequence and result of an action to see if it is right or if it is wrong. Deontology and Teleology are two specialist terms used to separate ethical theories. Also, this theory avoids and uncertainty.

How do deontology and teleology differ?

Summary — Teleological vs Deontological Ethics Teleological and deontological ethics are two opposing ethical theories that determine the moral goodness or badness of an action. When we make choices which result in the correct consequences, then we are acting morally; when we make choices which result in the incorrect consequences, then we are acting immorally. Which of these two types of theories do you find more valid for analyzing ethical conduct? Actions may be moral or immoral depending on circumstance. Obviously as it is a philosophical study, there are varying degrees and definitions that can be based simply on ones individual perception of these types. But, due to lies, deceit, and evils in the world it doesnt always work out this way. Teleological ethics denotes even if the act was wrong but the outcome turned out good then it is considered good. You and your friend are at school and a bully is bullying your friend.

What Is the Difference Between Deontology and Utilitarianism?

Explain the difference between absolutist and relativist ethics. After autopsy, information was revealed that the man died from an allergic reaction to acedimenaphin, not because of the heart attack. Teleological and Deontological Ethical Systems When looking at two separate definitions and trying to tell the differences between the two there will also be similarities that come out. Branches of deontological ethical systems can extend out to ethical formalism, religion, and natural law. They difference between deontology and teleology, is in essence, the same as the difference between absolutist and relativist theories.

The Difference Between Teleological and Deontological Ethical Systems Essay

Ethical systems can generally be broken down into three categories: deontological, teleological and virtue-based ethics. The act was bringing the bike back to your friend now what resulted from you trying to return the bike is you got a flat tire, which your Friend is upset about, an example of a teleological ethical system. Kantianism, divine command theory and some rights-based theories are generally categorized as deontological theories. Ethical formalism is defined as the motive and intent of a person has based on what action the person commits. Deontologists find lying to be unacceptable, for example, even when someone lies in order to bring about a desirable result. The parents ended up pressing charges and the coach lost her job and was incarcerated.

The Difference Between Teleological and Deontological Ethical Systems

If you do something and you meant good doing it even if that act turns out bad, your act is still considered to be good. Perfect duties have no legitimate exception whereas imperfect duties require us to promote certain goals, such as the general welfare of the group. You go over to the bully to stop him from bullying your friend, then you and the bully get into a fight. The term can be traced to 'telos,' which means end or goal. This is the polar opposite of a relativist approach to morality. According to teleological or consequentialist moral theory, all rational human actions are teleological in the sense that we reason about the means of achieving certain ends. Deontological ethicists focus on actions and rules.

The Difference Between Teleological and Deontological Ethical Systems

Thus, it is the contextualized consequences that make our behavior, good or bad, right or wrong. Moral behavior, therefore, is goal-directed. Also, there may be a tendency to adopt an attitude of the ends justifying the means. So, you can see that, in effect, it may be that the two theories have similar results, but the reasoning is very different and there are cases where the two theories disagree. Teleological and deontological ethics are two opposing ethical theories that determine the goodness or badness of an action. The high school coach intended for no harm but it could have been a real possibility that the teenager had an allergic reaction to the medication or that the family had strong religious beliefs and felt it was.

Difference between teleological and deontological ethics

The second is egoism, egoism is based off of the greater good of ones self as to the group. The goal of ethics is to explain how one achieves the good life for human beings. He said that in any situation the individual would choose the side that is in their best interest. A major problem to Hobbes? Later in the 13th century Thomas Aquinas developed Aristotle's theory and said this supernatural power was God. He said that in any situation the individual would choose the side that is in their best interest. This means that you follow rules of conduct in order to respect another person's autonomy, not to make anyone happy, although you do have a duty to help others and yourself become more rational in order to choose the right maxims consistently.