Erasure of mark denoting that stamp has been used Whoever, fraudulently or with intent to cause loss to Government, erase or removes from a stamp issued by the Government for the purpose of revenue, any mark, put or impressed upon such stamp for the purpose of denoting that the same has been used, or knowingly has in his possession or sells or disposes of any such stamp from which such mark has been erased or removed, or sell or disposes of any such stamp which he knows to have been used, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both. Keep Supporting Us :- Website : Website : Email : help ishanllb. Imprisonment for 6 months, or fine of 500 rupees, or both. Court to make out efforts within judicial sphere to know truth; Mohan Singh v. Even so, there must be material to show that the overt act or acts of one or more of the accused was or were done in furtherance of the common intention of all the accused.
By the Code of Criminal Procedure Amendment amending Act 2006 Act 25 of 2006 , the aforesaid Amendment Act of 2005 came to be amended. The evidence as to transmission of thoughts sharing the unlawful design may be sufficient; Kehar Singh v. The right of private defence of property against criminal trespass or mischief continues as long as the offender continues in the commission of criminal trespass or mischief. Explanation It is not necessary that the offender should intend to produce harm, or contemplate his disobedience as likely to produce harm. Right of private defence of the body and of property Every person has a right, subject to the restrictions contained in section 99, to defend— First.
He is the founder of this law portal. B refuses to do so. Making or selling instrument for counterfeiting coin Whoever makes or mends, or performs any part of the process of making or mending, or buys, sells or disposes of, any die or instrument, for the purpose of being used, or knowing or having reason to believe that it is intended to be used, for the purpose of counterfeiting coin, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine. Illustration Causing miscarriage unless caused in good faith for the purpose of saving the life of the woman is an offence independently of any harm which it may cause or be intended to cause to the woman. Kidnapping or abducting child under ten years with intent to steal from its person Whoever kidnaps or abducts any child under the age of ten years with the intention of taking dishonestly any movable property from the person of such child, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Illustrations a A, under the influence of passion excited by a provocation given by Z, intentionally kills.
Wrongful confinement for ten or more days Whoever wrongfully confines any person for ten days, or more, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which any extend to three years, and shall also be liable to fine. Threat of injury to public servant Whoever holds out any threat of injury to any public servant, or to any person in whom he believes that public servant to be interested, for the purpose of inducing that public servant to do any act, or to forbear or delay to do any act, connected with the exercise of the public functions of such public servant, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, or with fine, or with both. False information, with intent to cause public servant to use his lawful power to the injury of another person. The patient dies in consequence of the shock. Penalty for harbouring robbers or dacoits. Illustration A writes his name on the back of a bill of exchange payable to his order.
One of them alone defrauded third party in that room. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt to deter public servant from his duty Whoever voluntarily causes grievous hurt to any person being a public servant in the discharge of his duty as such public servant, or with intent to prevent or deter that person or any other public servant from discharging his duty as such public servant, or in consequence of anything done or attempted to be done by that person in the lawful discharge of his duty as such public servant, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine. Punishment of abetment if person abetted does act with different intention from that of abettor Whoever abets the commission of an offence shall, if the person abetted does the act with a different intention or knowledge from that of the abettor, be punished with the punishment provided for the offence which would have been committed if the act had been done with the intention or knowledge of the abettor and with no other. Owner or occupier of land on which an unlawful assembly is held Whenever any unlawful assembly or riot takes place, the owner or occupier of the land upon which such unlawful assembly is held, or such riot is committed, and any person having or claiming an interest in such land, shall be punishable with fine not exceeding one thousand rupees, if he or his agent or manager, knowing that such offence is being or has been committed, or having reason to believe it is likely to be committed, do not give the earliest notice thereof in his or their power to the principal officer at the nearest police-station, and do not, in the case of his or their having reason to believe that it was about to be committed, use all lawful means in his or their power to prevent, it and, in the event of its taking place, do not use all lawful means in his or their power to disperse or suppress the riot or unlawful assembly. Cheating with knowledge that wrongful loss may ensue to person whose interest offender is bound to protect Whoever cheats with the knowledge that he is likely thereby to cause wrongful loss to a person whose interest in the transaction to which the cheating relates, he was bound, either by law, or by a legal contract, to protect, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both. Here, if A alters his course without any intention to run down the boat C and in good faith for the purpose of avoiding the danger to the passengers in the boat B, he is not guilty of an offence, though he may run down the boat C by doing an act which he knew was likely to cause that effect, if it be found as a matter of fact that the danger which he intended to avoid was such as to excuse him in incurring the risk of running down the boat C.
The intended victim has a twin brother who exactly resembles him and the accused who is entrusted with the part of shooting the intended victim, on a mistaken impression shoots the twin brother. Z persists in the assault. Some illustrations will clarify the point. Here A takes dishonestly; A has therefore committed theft. The child, in consequence of the instigation, by mistake puts the poison into the food of Y, which is by the side of that of Z. Comments Witness Where the presence of informant and other witnesses at the time and place of incident was established and their positive evidence regarding the way in which the dacoity was committed found reliable having no previous enmity with accused, no case of false implication established therefore, conviction of accused under section 395 was just and proper; Chhedu v. State Amendment Uttar Pradesh In Uttar Pradesh the offence under section 363, I.
Explanation 2 A person is not deprived of the right of private defence against an act done, or attempted to be done, by the direction of a public servant, unless he knows, or has reason to believe, that the person doing the act is acting by such direction, or unless such person states the authority under which he acts, or if he has authority in writing, unless he produces such authority, if demanded. Private defence: object i In judging whether accused has exceeded his right to private defence or not the court has to take into account the weapons used; Madan Mohan Pandey v. Marrying again during lifetime of husband or wife. Giving false evidence Whoever, being legally bound by an oath or by an express provision of law to state the truth, or being bound by law to make a declaration upon any subject, makes any statement which is false, and which he either knows or believes to be false or does not believe to be true, is said to give false evidence. A common nuisance is not excused on the ground that it causes some convenience or advantage. Sub section 2 of Section 1 of the said Act provided as follows : 2 Save as otherwise provided in this Act, it shall come into force on such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette appoint.
B refuses to accept the bribe. As regards the extreme penalty of death to Nalani was concerned it was confirmed by a majority of 2 to 1. She was persistently brainwashed by A3 who became her husband and then the father of her child and her helplessness in escaping from the cobweb of Sivarasan and company. If common intention is proved but no overt act is attributed to the individual accused, section 34 will be attracted as essentially it involves vicarious liability but if participation of the accused in the crime is proved and common intention is absent, section 34 cannot be invoked; Jai Bhagwan v. Refusing to sign statement Whoever refuses to sign any statement made by him, when required to sign that statement by a public servant legally competent to require that he shall sign that statement, shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to three months, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both. Gandhi sustained injuries and fell down and succumbed to her injuries same day at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi. The original section 18 was rep.
Exposure and abandonment of child under twelve years, by parent or person having care of it. But, if A afterwards sells the book for his own benefit, he is guilty of an offence under this section. The woman is injured, but does not die, but the death of an unborn quick child with which she is pregnant is thereby caused. You may post your specific query based on your facts and details to get a response from one of the Lawyers at LawRato. C Amendment Act, 2005 is excluded and therefore not yet enforced. Act to which a person is compelled by threats Except murder, and offences against the State punishable with death, nothing is an offence which is done by a person who is compelled to do it by threats, which, at the time of doing it, reasonably cause the apprehension that instant death to that person will otherwise be the consequence: Provided the person doing the act did not of his own accord, or from a reasonable apprehension of harm to himself short of instant death, place himself in the situation by which he became subject to such constraint.
A is guilty only of an attempt to commit murder. Explanation 1 A person who causes bodily injury to another who is labouring under a disorder, disease or bodily infirmity, and thereby accelerates the death of that other, shall be deemed to have caused his death. The trial court found the accused guilty. Z believing the ground to be firm, treads on it, falls in and is killed. Assault or criminal force in attempt wrongfully to confine a person Whoever assaults or uses criminal force to any person, in attempting wrongfully to confine that person, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.