They are the primary sources of those big revenues. It can make other students feel upset. But that kind of system could leave many athletes open to real exploitation unless they can afford a good attorney or honest agent to negotiate on their behalf. Some athletes play the game to further there professional prospects while others simply play to earn a scholarship to attend college. Cash or a salary could be spent on wants rather than necessities, potentially leading the athletes into a debt they would not have with the benefit of a scholarship. Provides a source of funds After academic responsibilities, most college athletes spend their time practicing, which leaves little room for finding other means of making money to compensate for food, board, books and other expenses not covered by their scholarship grants.
There's nothing wrong with a college degree, but a college degree on its own isn't going to make them successful. Could they get more from these sources of income and find the money to pay players? They are full of impact that can result to injuries, where many players, especially those who are playing for the major leagues, have been seriously hurt at any point during games and even practices. Being nationally televised and making it deep into big tournaments can rack up a lot of wealth that colleges and universities can respectively cash in. How do those programs afford to pay players? A potential end to the seedy underbelly of college sports Right now, a lot of the most talented and sought-after athletes get secret offers for under-the-table perks. The best compensation the players get to today for all their work and their sweat is an athletic scholarship which just about covers their tuition fees.
Paying student athletes creates a number of variables which offer plenty of pros and cons to think about. They sacrifice many hours to practice, train, and compete—without any notion that they'll ever be professional athletes. They are fundamentally different entities. One of the benefits of work-study programs is that it can supplement the credits earned while supplementing college tuition costs. But there are many pros and cons to this debate, views that are shared by many.
In addition, they may need to hire accountants to help them prepare tax returns and keep track of their financial situation. In fact, head football and basketball coaches at several colleges and universities earn multi-million-dollar salaries, meaning that a lot of them have the highest-paying public jobs in their states. When everything comes down to dollars and cents, there could be more discrimination put into college campuses by paying college athletes than the benefits such an activity would provide. It could have negative consequences that ripple into other areas of higher education and impact non-athletes. It would prioritize athleticism over academics. This would definitely benefit everyone involved. Problems Among Peers If the athletes at a school are receiving pay checks, simply to go to school at play sports, the other students at the school may feel a great deal of envy and animosity.
They might also not have the capacity to give big paychecks and therefore lose out on talented students, who understandably want to receive the higher pay that larger schools can give. Who is profiting from all the money being made from football, basketball, baseball, and many other sports teams at these colleges? How about the revenues they generate? There are plenty of structural questions that would need to be resolved before paying college athletes became the norm. It's a controversial issue with a long history of inspiring passionate discourse and even some lawsuits. Many former collegiate players were compensated, but some felt it was inadequate and they were owed more. With television contracts and shoe deals alone, the athletes are really bringing in the money.
Plus, an athlete's ability to play sports at a high level will end when he or she is still young, but the benefits of receiving a college or university education can last a lifetime. But what was the real blowout? Playing sports of any kind comes with associated risks, which is why pro athletes are some of the highest paid individuals in the industry. For some institutions, the costs could actually go down. After all, one thing is clear: This controversy won't go away without significant changes to the status quo. Those who say college student-athletes should not be paid argue that they receive as a form of payment for their talents. They should be compensated for their risk. How often would athletes get paid? That's because college sports especially the major ones frequently require athletes to spend as much as 40 hours a week practicing, training, and competing.
But that's like telling someone to keep providing a valuable service for free or low pay because they'll win the lottery as soon as their contract expires. This gives teams and players more playing opportunities, which ultimately gives schools more chances to make money. They get to attend school at a greatly reduced cost thanks to the money generated by students who pay tuition and fees, the generosity of alumni, and, in a lot of cases, the taxes paid by the public. In short, you can't do things that are traditionally associated with being a professional athlete. What these athletes do year round: compete fiercely in a sport or multiple sports, is challenging and very risky injury wise, which is… 871 Words 4 Pages College sports are big money makers now a days. In conclusion on this debate on 'college students being paid for playing sports', I would like to say that college athletes do need to be paid some token amount for playing the games.
Others argue that paying students puts pressure on them to perform well in sports, and may detract attention from academic studies. No sane person can say without the appearance of bluffing that these athletes are students. Over the last twenty-five years the cost of college has quadrupled in real terms. The extra financial burden to schools There's no doubt that a lot of college and university athletic departments are big, big spenders. The most effective way of curbing this practice is to entitle every player to a substantial compensation amount for their services to college athletics teams.
It could create college credits that could be used toward graduation. If these athletes were paid, it would change their motives as students. I think an athletic scholarship is enough. Many of these athletes come from urban, low-class families and often leave school early because of the unimaginable pressure to be the main provider for their family at a young age. So they think that student athletes just need to work hard and remain patient for their future rewards. Sports scholarships pay for the majority of players to attend the school and play sports. Other students that are not involved in sports have more time to go out and get a job to help support themselves.
Out of all the high school athletes who graduate each year, only about two percent of them receive scholarships for college sports. The issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid has been one that comes up over and over, but is never truly solved. Paying the students could also give them reason to go and stay in college instead of going professional early. Possible Conflicts Another setback of paying athletes who play for collegiate sports is the possibility of students raising issues on equality when it comes to compensation. If they had to begin paying players, other programs would likely suffer as a result. So is it a good idea to pay college athletes or not? So, why does the most important parts of the machine… 1399 Words 6 Pages Argument for Paying College Athletes Stephen Elting Mercy College Have you ever heard of a business that made billions of dollars, yet did not pay their employees? The next year, they may transfer to another school with an even higher offer.