Legal residents who completed national service could be offered the extra advantage of an expedited naturalization process. The United States military has a variety of special forces soldiers who are send out on top missions and operations around the world. Government contracts of every type could be greatly reduced because of the influx of people needing work. The state of has an interesting history of military service. This leads us to the question: Is compulsory conscription a good thing or a bad thing? While mandatory military service requires every citizen to join and serve in the military, it is worth noting that not every person is cut out for it. Though you might not like to think about it, part of the process is risking young people lives at risk. Whether it is a physical, mental or psychological issue, not everyone is fit to meet the demands of the job.
The Cons of Compulsory Military Service 1. All in all, the military service should be optional, not compulsory, and everyone should be granted freedom of choice and not being forced to something against his plans, nature or individual character and world-view. Key to making this work is exempting as few people as possible. It disrupts other forms of education. Others learn the habits of healthy living and discipline as well as the skills in self-defense.
What Are the Cons of Compulsory Military Service? It compromises the quality of the military service. Should men compulsory attend the military service? Now, a draft can make military service more equitable among all groups in society. When there are mandatory enlistments happening, then more volunteers for long-term military service come forth. If this existed in the United States, many teenagers would have been forced to join the military. The Pros of Compulsory Military Service 1. With all eligible men and some women joining the military to work both in the frontlines and other areas of the military, there is an assurance that the nation will be safer and more secure at times of conflicts with other countries.
Some people because of their mental status would develope more anxious and chronic stress related anxieties. Military service creates a unique set of stresses that not everyone can handle on their own. This means that factors, such as depression and anxiety should be carefully considered. This could affect the countries in two different ways. That means more money, more jobs, more people hired to make and sell weapons and supplied to the conscript. On the contrary, the militaries of the countries that apply optional military service laws, are committed to humanly treat their men of arms, and to guarantee their rights in order to encourage many citizens to join the military. Military service is mandatory in a number of countries.
The United States government should continue to use its volunteer military service because of the over manning numbers of enlistees today. There are many countries in the world that have this type of policy implemented and it works well for them, however, there are certainly some issues that should be addressed and thought about. Discipline is a big one. List of Cons of Compulsory Military Service 1. Moreover, it risks the lives of young people who should have been enjoying life instead of fearing for their lives. Economic growth is seen in terms of flourishing businesses and individuals, which provides channels for taxation. It allows for the creation of a more professional force.
While increasing economic growth has several advantages to the nation and inhabitants of the nation, it has its fair share of disadvantages. What is more, nowadays the real strength of a country depends rather on well-qualified experts, able to operate complicated missiles than on the manpower. If you want to institutionalize the military as a compulsory duty of every man, woman or child, go ahead. Citizens are able to understand and develop appreciation for the sacrifices that people in the military made for their country. Actually I'd take a look at some of our sentencing guidelines and consider a strong push of compulsory service a la Conservation Corps, Peace Corps, etc. Why should it matter that the people conscripted could be working on jobs that actually provide tangible and transferrable goods and services to the people, or that they could be engaged in tertiary education and contribute in their own ways to the cutting edge of human knowledge and technology? Training in the military can teach individuals not only how to shoot straight or throw a salute, but it will also provide perks that go far beyond the technical skills necessary to get the job done.
Expecting people to volunteer themselves in times of war might be unrealistic. List of Cons of Mandatory Military Service 1. It ensures combat readiness for a country. Inexperience on the front lines often results in fatalities. Only the severely disabled physical, mental, emotional would be exempt.
It may affect badly their psyches and cause unforeseen harmful results. Compulsory service benefits also come with a multitude of problems. Mandatory military service can promote national unity. For women, this was not the practice. It managed to figure this out by determining the amount budgeted for the all-volunteer force as about 10% more than under the draft. All Israeli citizens are conscripted at age 18. Overall, Mandatory Military Service is neither good nor bad.
It creates a sense of shared responsibility among the people. And all of these can bring people together, especially when dealing with a cultural or political threat from other nations. World countries through the United Nations. This strategy, which normally enlists able-bodied youth, put the next generation to serious harm and even death. Mandating them to take part in military training could take away their chance at higher education or work. My practicum site was at the Department of Children and Family Services within the Legally Free Unit with Tommy Williams. Many people would go on to serve and remain in the military for several years.
This could potentially put new soldiers in the forefront in danger, providing poor combat skills. The other argument against conscription is that it is, in fact, unnecessary in the modern world- we have less and less wars, and the real forces are well-trained, small troops consisting of people whose whole life is fighting, not skinny, hunchbacked teenagers suffering from asthma. It is not for everyone. While engagement by the public can be a good thing, a military draft for an international conflict can be unpopular with some people, who would think they will be forced to fight for a cause they do not believe in, which can lead to civil unrest of a wide scale. The question is, which of the two is a more prominent outcome? I've had personal experience with kids in the wilderness programs and it seems to have a fairly positive track record.